
Personalized medicine could be seen from an economic point of view as delivering “mass customization” to people in a healthcare context at an affordable cost. Personalized medicine has attracted a lot of hype and is often perceived as a far-future initiative that is not yet ready for useful value delivery to real-world patients.
Personalized medicine uses an evidence based approach, maximizing efficacy and the best therapeutic outcome, while minimizing adverse events. So far, so good, who could say no to that?, but this utopic vision will need to overcome several barriers to become a reality. There are at least 4 problems to address:
#2 The blockbuster model does not work here. The economics of delivering a large number of molecules targeted at smaller patient populations will demand a radical transformation from the current model predicated on the discovery, development and commercialization of a very small number of molecules targeted at large patient segments. How can we define viable business models of “targeted therapeutics” to very small populations of patients while assuring profitability? This will be clearly the age of biotech (small size, high speed, more adaptability), and pharma companies will suffer.
#3 Drug approval is so XXth century… It is so slow (7-10 years to market), it is so expensive, and more importantly it is so flawed when analysing drugs for very, very small populations of patients… Fundamental rethinking of the regulatory regime to assure safety and efficacy will be needed to be agile. Additional periods of exclusivity may be imperative for targeted therapeutics to be rendered viable.

2 comments:
Why personalized medicine is always seen as "more biotech medicine"?
I agree with you. Future of the market is customization.
But your analysis keeps in the old-fashioned medical industry mindframe: we (doctors/industry) deliver a pre-packaged solution, you are ill so you accept it.
What about a "low-technological" personalized medicine. What about a "personal physician / caregiver"? What about the "power of the healer"?
You can "customize" medicine by "giving the pill that fits with your genomic profile". But this is not "personal medicine". It is just more hightech industrial medicine.
I would propose a "personalized medicine" based in the recovery of the role of the healer (not just the health-care professional but also the caregivers), and in the recovery of the own patient ability to cope with the "disease and death inherent to life". A patient that customize his health-care experience as far as he take more informed decisions, decisions that fit better with his own believes, wishes and fears.
Ok, pharmacogenomics and personalized drugs are 'cool' ideas. But are not the answer to the de-personalized medicine we have today.
Great comment Dr. Bonis.
Post a Comment